Current:Home > NewsEPA bans asbestos, a deadly carcinogen still in use decades after a partial ban was enacted -FundPrime
EPA bans asbestos, a deadly carcinogen still in use decades after a partial ban was enacted
View
Date:2025-04-15 12:09:00
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency on Monday announced a comprehensive ban on asbestos, a carcinogen that kills tens of thousands of Americans every year but is still used in some chlorine bleach, brake pads and other products.
The final rule marks a major expansion of EPA regulation under a landmark 2016 law that overhauled regulations governing tens of thousands of toxic chemicals in everyday products, from household cleaners to clothing and furniture.
The new rule would ban chrysotile asbestos, the only ongoing use of asbestos in the United States. The substance is found in products such as brake linings and gaskets and is used to manufacture chlorine bleach and sodium hydroxide, also known as caustic soda, including some that is used for water purification.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan called the final rule a major step to protect public health.
“With today’s ban, EPA is finally slamming the door on a chemical so dangerous that it has been banned in over 50 countries,’' Regan said. ”This historic ban is more than 30 years in the making, and it’s thanks to amendments that Congress made in 2016 to fix the Toxic Substances Control Act,’' the main U.S. law governing use of chemicals.
Exposure to asbestos is known to cause lung cancer, mesothelioma and other cancers, and it is linked to more than 40,000 deaths in the U.S. each year. Ending the ongoing uses of asbestos advances the goals of President Joe Biden’s Cancer Moonshot, a whole-of-government initiative to end cancer in the U.S., Regan said.
“The science is clear: Asbestos is a known carcinogen that has severe impacts on public health. This action is just the beginning as we work to protect all American families, workers and communities from toxic chemicals,’' Regan said.
The 2016 law authorized new rules for tens of thousands of toxic chemicals found in everyday products, including substances such as asbestos and trichloroethylene that for decades have been known to cause cancer yet were largely unregulated under federal law. Known as the Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act, the law was intended to clear up a hodgepodge of state rules governing chemicals and update the Toxic Substances Control Act, a 1976 law that had remained unchanged for 40 years.
The EPA banned asbestos in 1989, but the rule was largely overturned by a 1991 Court of Appeals decision that weakened the EPA’s authority under TSCA to address risks to human health from asbestos or other existing chemicals. The 2016 law required the EPA to evaluate chemicals and put in place protections against unreasonable risks.
Asbestos, which was once common in home insulation and other products, is banned in more than 50 countries, and its use in the U.S. has been declining for decades. The only form of asbestos known to be currently imported, processed or distributed for use in the U.S. is chrysotile asbestos, which is imported primarily from Brazil and Russia. It is used by the chlor-alkali industry, which produces bleach, caustic soda and other products.
Most consumer products that historically contained chrysotile asbestos have been discontinued.
While chlorine is a commonly used disinfectant in water treatment, there are only eight chlor-alkali plants in the U.S. that still use asbestos diaphragms to produce chlorine and sodium hydroxide. The plants are mostly located in Louisiana and Texas.
The use of asbestos diaphragms has been declining and now accounts for less than one-third of the chlor-alkali production in the U.S., the EPA said.
The EPA rule will ban imports of asbestos for chlor-alkali as soon as the rule is published but will phase in prohibitions on chlor-alkali use over five or more years to provide what the agency called “a reasonable transition period.’'
A ban on most other uses of asbestos will effect in two years.
The National Association of Clean Water Agencies, which represents 350 publicly owned wastewater treatment agencies, said before the final rule was announced that an immediate ban on asbestos would “almost certainly cause shortages and price increases for chlorine and other disinfection and treatment chemicals used by the water sector.’'
The American Chemistry Council, the chemical industry’s largest lobbying group, said a 15-year transition period is needed to avoid a significant disruption of chlorine and sodium hydroxide supplies.
A ban on asbestos in oilfield brake blocks, aftermarket automotive brakes and linings and other gaskets will take effect in six months.
The EPA rule allows asbestos-containing sheet gaskets to be used until 2037 at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina to ensure that safe disposal of nuclear materials can continue on schedule.
Scott Faber, senior vice president of the Environmental Working Group, an advocacy group that pushed to ban asbestos, hailed the EPA action.
“For too long, polluters have been allowed to make, use and release toxics like asbestos and PFAS without regard for our health,’' Faber said. “Thanks to the leadership of the Biden EPA, those days are finally over.”
Separately, the EPA is also evaluating so-called legacy uses of asbestos in older buildings, including schools and industrial sites, to determine possible public health risks. A final risk evaluation is expected by the end of the year.
___
Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at https://apnews.com/hub/us-environmental-protection-agency.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- In W.Va., New GOP Majority Defangs Renewable Energy Law That Never Had a Bite
- Worldwide Effort on Clean Energy Is What’s Needed, Not a Carbon Price
- The Climate Change Health Risks Facing a Child Born Today: A Tale of Two Futures
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Shawn Mendes and Camila Cabello’s New PDA Pics Prove Every Touch Is Ooh, La-La-La
- Clean Power Startups Aim to Break Monopoly of U.S. Utility Giants
- Why the VA in Atlanta is throwing 'drive-through' baby showers for pregnant veterans
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Situation ‘Grave’ for Global Climate Financing, Report Warns
Ranking
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- A flash in the pan? Just weeks after launch, Instagram Threads app is already faltering
- What Dr. Fauci Can Learn from Climate Scientists About Responding to Personal Attacks Over Covid-19
- 10-year-old boy uses musical gift to soothe homeless dogs at Texas shelter
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Major Corporations Quietly Reducing Emissions—and Saving Money
- We asked, you answered: What's your secret to staying optimistic in gloomy times?
- The History of Ancient Hurricanes Is Written in Sand and Mud
Recommendation
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
Getting ahead of back-to-school shopping? The 2020 Apple MacBook Air is $100 off at Amazon
Unlikely Firms Bring Clout and Cash to Clean Energy Lobbying Effort
Paramedics who fell ill responding to Mexico hotel deaths face own medical bills
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Underwater noises detected in area of search for sub that was heading to Titanic wreckage, Coast Guard says
Jonathan Majors' domestic violence trial scheduled for August in New York City
In House Bill, Clean Energy on the GOP Chopping Block 13 Times